What evidence do you have that it's fake?Pure Steel wrote:This really seems a fake. I mean, every file can be opened with enough time and technology, so it seems to me a really poor insurance.
It's protected by an 256 bits AES-key consisting of 78 digits, which has 115 quattuorvigintillion possible combinations. You could bruteforce it in theory, but the highest successful bruteforce of an AES-key was on a 64 bit one. According to wiki: "AES permits the use of 256-bit keys. Breaking a symmetric 256-bit key by brute force requires 2128 times more computational power than a 128-bit key. A device that could check a billion billion (10 18) AES keys per second would in theory require about 3×10 51 years to exhaust the 256-bit key space."
So it's safe to say that the insurance is far from poor.
He's mainly funded through gifts from sympathetic donators.Even though I don't think Assange deserve such a hunt (I'm for free information), I'm wondering about who really is there behind this man. He seems the defender of the free information but I think he has a little too much money, security and opportunities aroud himself to be on his own.
I don't think so. The information is being leaked by people who have some interest in that information being public, so the only thing that's directing Assange is the availability of information which the Illuminati try to keep secret. If it wasn't Assange it would've been somebody else.I don't think it's sci-fi if we say that there's a bigger power that allows him to do what he does, the very question is: Assange is being "directed" on the information he leaks?